I need to start this post by clarifying my intentions. My goal is not to disrespect any soldier or supporter of the American military. My purpose is to lay out some of the reasons why I myself do not and cannot support the military and to point to a few reasons why I disagree with some of the evaluations of my position. That is all. If you read any more than that into this post then there has been a complete failure of communication.
Several people have told me lately that they, or someone they love, fought in recent wars not because they believed in the cause but because they had a sense of duty to their country. Now as a Christian I am terribly suspicious of this sort of shallow deontological reasoning. Our greatest, more precisely, our only duty is to God. This duty necessarily precludes fighting in unjust wars (although, I would make the case that it goes even further, that Christians in fact should never use or promote violence.) However, I will let it suffice for now that Christians should not fight in any war not deemed “just” as determined by Augustine’s Just War Criteria. The distinct call of the biblical witness in fact compels us to openly and boldly defy “the call of duty” by the nation in which we find ourselves if it remotely conflicts with the call Christ has on our lives as non-violent peacemakers and aliens and strangers on this terrestrial globe. So if we want to make an appeal to a deontological ethic then I suggest that as Christians this can only mean that we seek out our duty to God, not to country, especially when the two are clearly in contradiction. With that said, I would make the argument that patriotism and the sense of patriotic duty that follows are frighteningly close to idolatry. The nation seeks to be the primary or even sole entity that is capable of our provision and protection and in return demands our allegiance. This sounds eerily familiar to the Shadrack, Meshack, and Abendigo story. We know better because it is God who is our sole provider and protector and the only one that can rightfully demand our allegiance.
In tandem with this, I have also been told by several folks that I cant make an intelligible judgment about the military since I myself have never been a part of the military. There are three problems with this accusation. First, I grew up in a military family. I am very familiar with how the military operates. I spent the greater part of my childhood shopping at the BX/PX and Commissary, being waved through the gates of various military bases and yes, recurrently being schooled in patriotism, duty to country and inherent honor that should be bestowed on any who have put on a military uniform. Not to mention, the almost absolute trust that we apparently supposed to put in our government and our military. I know what it is like to have friends and family away at war, what its like to deal with untimely deaths due to both enemy and friendly fire, and I even had a AWAC crash right down the street from my house. Several of my friends lost parents in that disaster. I think I have a little bit of perspective on the military. Some may object that I don’t know about the situation in the Middle East, to which I would concede that I don’t know as much as I would like to. However, I would say that I am more informed than most Americans, because my main research interests in recent years have related to the wars in which we now find ourselves. I would also like to add that currently that all my information about the middle east crisis is at best secondary, or tertiary, but that I intend to travel with a Christian peacemaking mission to either Iraq or Palestine next year. If after that trip my views radically change I would be happy to admit that. For now however my best judgment is that Christians should not be involved in fighting this or any other (unjust) war.
Second, this myopic assessment misses the greater point that I am not making a judgment on any military in particular, but on the Christian’s place in relation to any and all forms of militarism. It matters little to me if it is the military of America or China or Greece (I list these three countries because they are the ones in which I have lived) that is calling upon the Christian to fight, the Christian must reject this call if it in any way stands in contrast with the biblical witness. I am not specifically against the American military; I am against all militaries. It is my belief, as a Christian and as an aspiring theologian and philosopher/ethicist, that I am not only capable of declaring the truth of Jesus’ non-violent testimony and the harm of Jingoism (of any person in any nation), but obligated to do so. I am not making judgments on American soldiers, rather I am articulating what I believe to be the teaching of Jesus and the best logical choice for a Christian in anytime or place; that is the rejection of the myth of redemptive violence and a critically thought out ethic in relation to issues of war and peace.
Third, to say this necessarily implies that one is not qualified to make a judgment on any thing unless he or she has personally experienced it. This of course is fallacious. I am not yet a parent, but I can, and you would all likely agree, make the assessment that it is bad parenting to punch your child in the face. I don’t have to be a parent to make this call, nor do I have to be a soldier to declare that it is not acceptable, at the very least, for a Christian to fight for an unjust cause. Simply put, it is an erroneous claim that one cannot give any opinion on a topic until he or she has personally experienced it. That mentality goes against any convention of academia because often our best knowledge comes from the outside in not the other way around. While experience can certainly enlighten a position, it is not fundamental to the formation of an informed perspective. The witness of scripture and the early church, along with the best theologians and Christian ethicists throughout the centuries, would univocally point to a position that requires Christians to view their duty to God and his justice to universally trump any allegiance to a country or any other cause.
Finally, and I wont deal with this in any depth at all (John Howard Yoder, Stanley Hauerwas and Greg Boyd among others have dealt with this rather extensively), some point to the violence in the Old Testament as reason enough for Christians to fight in the military today. There are at least three fundamental problems with this argument. First, simply put we are not living in the times of the Old Testament nor are we the nation of God’s chosen people. In the text of the OT we see that God used his chosen people, often against his seemingly original intention, to commit acts of violence. The reasons for this are hotly debated in the theological world, but either way it is certainly true that the people of God are no longer confined to a particular nation or ethnic group. Therefore it is only reasonable to assume that no nation is God’s instrument of justice and righteousness in the world today. Rather it is the witness of Christians living sacrificially that play this role not by using violence, but by following the non-violent example of Jesus.
Second, the Old Testament violence almost universally was about pointing to the power of God, not to Israel’s military might. While God certainly used violence in the OT it was most often his miraculous intervention, not the power of the world’s best military, that won the battles. It is also worth mentioning that the military conquests of the OT look nothing like the current wars. They were about establishing God’s people as the primary heralds of God’s sovereignty and supremacy over all the nations and their gods. This war, while some may intend it to be for the same reasons, cannot possibly accomplish this because America is not God’s chosen people and more importantly because Jesus has called us to conquer by the power of the cross not the power of the sword.
Third, and most importantly, we know Jesus to be the most complete and authoritative revelation of God’s Character, and the one to whom we have given our lives and agreed to follow. This means we don’t start defining Christian ethics by looking to the narratives of the Old Testament; we look to the person and teachings of Jesus who is the Logos. It is through this lens that we can then appropriately assess the OT and the other writings in Scripture. If you start somewhere else, then I believe, that your reasoning will be fundamentally flawed because you have tried to define the greater by the lesser, the creator by the actions of his creation. While the bible is the word of God, Jesus is the Word of God. That distinction must be made if we are going to be able to establish any acceptable biblical ethic. It is Jesus who shows us God, and through whom we interpret all the rest of God’s revelations.
Again, my intention here is not to condemn or disrespect anyone. It is simply to lay out the reasons why I take the position I do in regards to the relationship between the church and the military. Regardless of where you come down on the issues I must say that I love you. All of my brothers and sisters, from soldiers to housewives, preachers to pediatricians are special to me and I cherish the family of God in a way that cannot effectively be expressed in words. I hope this note is challenging, maybe even convicting, but never condemning or judging. May God be with us all as we wrestle through this gauntlet that is life.



Recent Comments